What This Theme Explores
Memory and Unreliable Narration in Brain on Fire examines how identity depends on what we can remember and how we tell it. As Susannah Cahalan’s brain inflames and her memory collapses, the “self” that narrates her life also disappears, forcing a new kind of storytelling that relies on others. The memoir tests whether a coherent self can be rebuilt from evidence—interviews, medical records, and video—when first-person memory fails. Ultimately, it argues that identity is not only private and internal but also preserved in the memories and love of those around us.
How It Develops
At first, the cracks are subtle. Early on, Susannah misses a crucial work meeting and brushes it off as carelessness, then begins to lose time and emotional control (Chapter 1-5 Summary). Her perceptions skew—Times Square’s colors become unbearably bright and unreal—signaling that her senses, not just her recall, are unreliable (Chapter 6-10 Summary). In Part One, she still tells her own story, but the voice grows estranged from the person it describes.
After her first major seizure, the narrative breaks completely. Susannah admits her memory is now a void, and the book reorients: the story moves into the perspectives of her family, her boyfriend Stephen, and doctors, as well as objective medical notes. We witness her paranoid delusions—like the Capgras Delusion—at secondhand through others’ accounts (Chapter 11-15 Summary), and then her descent into catatonia is recorded clinically rather than lived by the narrator (Chapter 21-25 Summary). The book becomes investigative journalism about a life its subject cannot remember.
Recovery turns the narrator into a researcher of her own past. Susannah studies the hospital videotape to see the “other” self she cannot recall (Chapter 31-35 Summary), collaborates with her father to build a timeline riddled with gaps only others can fill (Chapter 41-45 Summary), and tests her own memories against evidence—most strikingly when the vividly recalled “FLIGHT RISK” band proves to have never existed (Chapter 51-53 Summary). Part Three reframes authorship as curation: her story becomes a mosaic assembled from external shards.
Key Examples
-
The Author’s Note: Susannah opens by disqualifying herself as a fully reliable guide, explaining that much of the book’s timeline is “blank or capriciously hazy.” By foregrounding her limits, she invites readers to weigh evidence over recollection and primes us to accept shifting narrative vantage points.
-
The First Seizure: The scene is told entirely through Stephen’s eyes as Susannah’s body stiffens and foams—she never recovers any memory of it. This absence marks the hard border between inner experience and outward record, making third-person testimony essential to continue the narrative at all.
-
The “FLIGHT RISK” Band: Susannah, her family, and friends all “remember” an orange wristband that hospital staff later confirm doesn’t exist. The episode shows how confidently the brain can fabricate and socially reinforce false memories, warning us not to equate vividness with truth.
-
The Hospital Videotape: Watching her own deterioration on screen provides undeniable, external proof of events the narrator can’t internally retrieve. The tape bridges lost time and present consciousness, but it also underscores the alienation of seeing a self you can’t recognize.
Character Connections
As narrator and subject, Susannah embodies the paradox of this theme: a journalist trained to verify facts who cannot verify her own life. Her authorship becomes an ethical method—cross-checking memories, privileging documents—by which she tries to reconstitute a coherent self without pretending certainty she doesn’t have.
Tom Cahalan, Rhona Nack, and Stephen function as custodians of her identity when she cannot hold it herself. Tom’s journal and the shared parental log become anchor texts; Stephen’s moment-to-moment recollections supplement the clinical record. Their memories are not sentimental extras but structural beams: without them, the story—and the self it rebuilds—would collapse.
Dr. Souhel Najjar reframes unreliability as neurology rather than moral failure. By locating inflammation in regions central to memory (like the hippocampus), he translates chaos into mechanism, shifting the narrative from “madness” to a treatable disease and restoring meaning to the very gaps that once unmade Susannah’s identity.
Symbolic Elements
-
The Hospital Videotape: An emblem of objective truth that feels estranging, the tape captures a version of Susannah that is historically accurate but emotionally inaccessible. It dramatizes the split between what happened and what is remembered.
-
The Journals: Raw, contemporaneous, and messy, these writings signify the human drive to impose order on chaos. They are the unpolished substrate from which a coherent life narrative can be reconstructed.
-
The Chronology: The painstaking timeline, with blank stretches only others can fill, literalizes fractured memory. Each filled gap marks a place where relationship repairs identity.
Contemporary Relevance
This theme speaks to our moment of contested truths and the documented fallibility of eyewitness memory. Susannah’s shift from psychiatric misdiagnosis to neurological diagnosis also models a compassionate, science-informed approach to symptoms often dismissed as “mental,” urging us to de-stigmatize breakdowns we don’t yet understand. In a world saturated with recordings and digital traces, her story asks how we should balance subjective experience with external evidence—and reminds us that who we are may depend as much on shared archives as on private recollection.
Essential Quote
“Because I am physically incapable of remembering that time, writing this book has been an exercise in my comprehending what was lost... Even still, I readily admit that I’m an unreliable source. No matter how much research I’ve done, the consciousness that defines me as a person wasn’t present then.”
This confession reframes the memoir as an inquiry rather than a recollection, legitimizing the book’s reliance on records and other people’s memories. It also articulates the theme’s core insight: when consciousness goes offline, identity can still be rebuilt—but only by reuniting evidence, community memory, and a narrator honest about her limits.