What This Theme Explores
Truth vs. Perception in No One Can Know asks whether reality is what happened—or what people are persuaded to believe happened. The novel probes how communities, partners, and siblings build narratives to survive, often at the expense of objective fact. It suggests that perception can harden into social reality, shaping reputations, relationships, and even legal outcomes. Most troubling, it shows how the most compelling story can eclipse the truth so completely that the truth becomes unknowable.
How It Develops
From the outset, truth is buried beneath a deliberate performance. In the Preface, the sisters stage the crime scene and synchronize their statements, making a calculated wager that a coherent performance will beat messy honesty. That choice doesn’t just misdirect the police; it installs a false origin story that will govern how the town and the sisters understand themselves for years.
Returning to Arden Hills revives the town’s preferred narrative about Emma Palmer: the “bad daughter” who murdered her parents. The house is vandalized, strangers sneer, and even a routine transaction becomes an indictment—a gauntlet captured in the Chapter 1-5 Summary. That public script infects Emma’s private life when her husband Nathan Gates learns the nature of her parents’ deaths; trust gives way to suspicion, proving how quickly intimate perception can be rewritten by a powerful rumor.
The sisters’ reunion exposes that public narratives have private counterparts. Their confrontation reveals that each has been living inside a story assembled from fear, trauma, and fragments. Juliette "JJ" Palmer confesses to a killing she only believes she committed, mistaking a sensation—guilty memory—for fact. The novel shows how personal perception, especially under trauma and substances, can mimic certainty while concealing crucial gaps.
Finally, after violence erupts and personal losses mount, Daphne Palmer crafts a new “truth” that the authorities accept: Rick Hadley did it. By mastering the evidentiary theater—what will appear plausible, what will satisfy the town’s appetite—she proves that the right story, told at the right time, can overwrite both guilt and innocence. The novel ends not with the revelation of a stable truth, but with the installation of a convincing one.
Key Examples
-
The Initial Lie
The sisters’ first coordinated cover-up is a blueprint for the novel’s ethics of perception: it asserts that control over the story is protection. By cleaning up and scripting their interviews, they replace ambiguity with a single, consumable version of events, forcing institutions to chase a narrative rather than facts. This move creates safety in the short term while setting the stage for years of corrosive doubt.“This is what we’re going to do,” she says, and when she tells them, they don’t argue. They don’t say anything. They simply obey. ... Dressed in clean clothes—there will be no blood found on them, no bloodied clothes found anywhere on the property.
-
Nathan’s Shifting Perception
Emma withholds the truth from Nathan, trusting that the perception of a tragic accident will sustain their marriage better than the complicated reality. When the truth surfaces, his immediate, toneless questions turn their intimacy into an interrogation, showing how fragile love becomes once perception is destabilized. His doubt doesn’t require evidence—just the suggestion of a darker story.“You’re going to hear that I did it,” she whispered.
He was quiet for a long time. When he spoke again, his words were toneless. “Did you?”
“No. It wasn’t me,” Emma said. She wondered if he believed her. She wondered if anyone had ever believed her. -
The Town’s Judgment
The graffiti—“MURDERER,” “KILLER,” “PSYCHO”—turns rumor into architecture. These words convert the Palmer home into a public monument to a lie, ensuring that anyone who enters encounters the town’s verdict first. Scrubbing them off becomes an emblem of how hard it is to reclaim a story once a community has stamped its perception onto the physical world. -
JJ’s False Memory
JJ’s fourteen-year self-conviction demonstrates how trauma manufactures certainty. A drug-hazed night, a handful of images, and unresolved fear produce a narrative that dominates her adulthood, shaping choices and self-worth. Her confession emerges not from truth but from the powerful illusion that feeling guilty equals being guilty.
Character Connections
Emma Palmer
Emma lives in the crosshairs of competing perceptions: the town’s myth of a remorseless killer and her private knowledge of her sisters’ actions. Her survival strategy—controlling how much of herself others can see—protects her but isolates her, eroding intimacy with Nathan and making her complicit in replacing truth with performance. She becomes both victim and steward of perception, proving how easily protection slides into manipulation.
Daphne Palmer
Daphne is the novel’s consummate dramaturge. Quiet observation and sharp intelligence enable her to anticipate what authorities and neighbors will find credible, and she engineers evidence to fit that expectation. Her final act—framing Rick Hadley—lays bare the novel’s unsettling claim: the person who understands the rules of perception can write the law of reality.
Juliette “JJ” Palmer
JJ is the most tragic casualty of misperceived truth. Raised to perform perfection and later haunted by a fragmentary night, she internalizes an identity—murderer—that calcifies into self-concept. Her arc exposes how identities forged under surveillance and abuse are less about who we are than about the stories we were forced to inhabit.
Rick Hadley
Hadley treats his hunch about Emma as fact, policing her life through harassment and tunnel vision. His refusal to entertain alternate explanations makes him a steward of communal prejudice. In the end, he is consumed by the very mechanism he wielded: a constructed perception so persuasive it becomes incontrovertible.
Symbolic Elements
The Palmer House
Dubbed the “Murder House” by outsiders, the home incarnates the collision between private reality and public myth. For the sisters, it vaults their buried memories and guarded loyalties; for the town, it is a stage for scandal. Their cleaning and repair become an attempt to reconcile the past and retell it, situating the house at the center of their Family Trauma and Dysfunction.
The Graffiti
Spray-painted slurs literalize how perception occupies space. They are invasive not only because they deface property, but because they hijack narrative authority—forcing the sisters to live inside the town’s accusation until they can repaint their walls and their story.
The Sisters’ Personas
Childhood roles—JJ the perfect one, Emma the rebel, Daphne the invisible—are survival masks crafted to satisfy parental control and evade punishment. These personas outlast childhood, dictating how each sister interprets the past and misreads the others in the present. The theme insists that shedding a mask is as difficult as disproving a rumor.
Contemporary Relevance
In an age of viral narratives and algorithmic outrage, the novel’s portrait of perception hardening into “truth” feels alarmingly familiar. Arden Hills functions like a social feed: a few emotionally charged claims outcompete evidence, and repetition becomes belief. The sisters’ struggle to retake their story mirrors the uphill battle of anyone misrepresented online—where correction rarely travels as far as accusation. Marshall’s caution is clear: when institutions and communities reward coherence over complexity, the plausible story will eclipse the true one.
Essential Quote
“It’s the last true thing she says for a long time.”
This line, placed at the threshold of the initial cover-up, names the novel’s governing condition: once a persuasive version of events is launched, truth recedes. It foreshadows years in which survival depends on performing credibility, not proving fact—and it primes readers to question every perception they encounter, including their own.