What This Theme Explores
Freedom vs. Servitude in The Book of Azrael asks whether love can justify chains and whether agency survives when every choice is bound to someone else’s survival. For Dianna, bondage is both literal and willed, a bargain struck with Kaden to protect her sister Gabby. The story interrogates the difference between being owned and choosing to be owned, between loyalty and possession, between duty and manipulation. It also exposes the hollow comfort of “freedom” purchased with someone else’s captivity and the psychic erosion that long-term servitude inflicts.
How It Develops
At the outset, Dianna’s servitude is her unchallenged reality: the “Bloodthirsty Queen,” she wields violence as Kaden’s instrument and rationalizes her captivity as the price of Gabby’s life. Her inner monologue draws stark parallels between her situation and the celestials enslaved by Kaden’s forces, revealing that the true prison is as much psychological as it is magical. Even her moments of power feel borrowed, contingent on Kaden’s favor.
In the middle of the narrative, the theme tightens. Kaden tests the hierarchy by compelling Dianna to sacrifice personal loyalties—forcing her to kill her friend Drake Vanderkai—and to accept that love and obedience can be made indistinguishable. Visits with Gabby sharpen the contrast: Gabby lives the very freedom Dianna has bought, yet chafes under its cost, pushing Dianna to question whether a freedom founded on another’s degradation can be called freedom at all.
By the end, Dianna tries to reclaim agency not by breaking chains but by choosing them: she enters a new, self-authored bond with Liam (Samkiel), gambling that the right master might make space for dignity. The wager collapses. Kaden’s public murder of Gabby annihilates the premise of the original bargain, proving that servitude offers no real security—and detonating Dianna’s restraint into ungoverned, liberating fury. The theme resolves not in clean emancipation but in the ruin of every coercive pact that claimed to protect what Dianna loved.
Key Examples
-
Dianna’s recognition of her own bondage emerges as she watches Alistair mentally enslave a celestial, realizing she is complicit in a system that mirrors her own captivity. The moment reframes her “choice” to serve as a survival tactic entangled with guilt and self-loathing.
Was I not the same to Kaden? Peter was long gone now that Alistair held his mind, and no power in the Etherworld could break that hold. As soon as he wasn’t useful anymore, he would be discarded just like the others before him. I had helped, just as I had for centuries. A part of me ached as I watched him go about the tasks instructed to him. Damn human heart. — Chapter 1-5 Summary
-
Kaden’s refusal to release Dianna crystallizes the asymmetry of power: her plea for a life with Gabby is met with a single, absolute “Never.” This scene strips away the illusion that loyalty has earned her leverage; love, in Kaden’s hands, is a tool of possession.
"Let me go," I whispered. It was a request and a silent demand. One that meant more than where he had me now. One I often dreamed about when the fighting and violent nature of my life got to be too much. One I knew would never be granted. I ached for a life outside of this. A life with my sister. A life where I was loved and could be loved. Just a life. But I knew his answer before he spoke, and I knew without a shadow of a doubt he meant it. Kaden leaned back, his eyes dancing over my face before a single finger tipped my chin up, forcing me to meet his gaze. "Never." — Chapter 6-10 Summary
-
The argument between Dianna and Gabby voices the theme’s paradox: Gabby refuses a freedom built on Dianna’s degradation, while Dianna clings to her sacrifice as love’s purest expression. Their clash exposes how coercion can masquerade as devotion when the currency is a loved one’s safety.
"I hate that he holds it over your head. That you have to do everything he says because of me." I spun her to face me. My hands were firm on her shoulders as I held her gaze and smiled. "I don’t regret it. I never have and I never will. I knew the price when I asked that day. I would rather answer his every call like a dog on a leash than lose you." — Chapter 16-20 Summary
-
Dianna’s blood deal with Liam reconfigures, rather than ends, her bondage. By selecting a new master, she asserts a narrow form of agency—choosing the terms of her captivity to secure Gabby’s safety—only to learn that chosen servitude can still be catastrophic.
"I’m yours. You can kill me or lock me up for eternity. I don’t care. But for her, I ask for immunity. She is innocent in this. She always has been." — Chapter 31-35 Summary
Character Connections
Dianna embodies the theme’s tragic center: her identity is built on a vow that trades autonomy for love. Calling herself a “dog on a leash,” she negotiates with captivity—justifying it, modifying it, finally trying to direct it—until Kaden’s ultimate violation reveals that bargains struck under duress cannot produce true freedom. Her evolution from weapon to self-willed force exposes how oppression can incubate both complicity and revolt.
Kaden is servitude’s architect, a liberator in rhetoric and a master in practice. He promises freedom from celestial oppression while demanding absolute obedience from his own, collapsing love and loyalty into control. His manipulation of Dianna’s devotion to Gabby shows how power sustains itself by commandeering the most intimate bonds.
Gabby is both the reason for and the critic of Dianna’s bondage. Grateful yet burdened, she recognizes that her “freedom” is distorted by the sacrifice that sustains it, insisting that survival without dignity is not living. Her pushback forces the narrative to ask whether love that shackles can still be called love.
Alistair and Tobias represent the seduction and safety of unquestioned obedience. Their long habituation to Kaden’s command blurs duty with identity, suggesting that willing servitude can feel like belonging—until it erases the self it claims to protect.
Liam (Samkiel) complicates mastery by aligning it with protection rather than possession. Bound by lineage and responsibility, he understands captivity as a noble burden; his pact with Dianna offers structure without brutality. Yet his role demonstrates that even benevolent control cannot substitute for autonomy.
Symbolic Elements
The Chains of Abareath literalize captivity: when fastened on Dianna, they suppress her power and render her submission visible. Their magic turns the abstract bargain into a body-level constraint, underscoring how servitude invades capability and identity.
Novas, Kaden’s volcanic island lair, is a lavish prison—the aesthetics of power masking confinement. Its beauty makes captivity feel almost domestic, exposing how gilded surroundings can normalize subjugation.
Dianna’s wyvern form is a fleeting antidote: the freedom of flight as an embodied counterpoint to her terrestrial bondage. The sky becomes a realm where duty cannot reach her, however briefly.
This was the only time I felt real freedom, and I reveled in it. — Chapter 11-15 Summary
Blood deals formalize servitude as contract, binding life and will to another’s terms. By signing away autonomy for love, Dianna transforms affection into obligation, a magic that reveals how promises can harden into chains.
Contemporary Relevance
The story echoes contemporary concerns about coercive control, toxic relationships, and the trade-offs people make for family, work, or community. It captures how systems of power weaponize love—holding safety, jobs, or care hostage to ensure compliance—and how “choices” made under pressure complicate our notions of consent. Dianna’s attempt to manage her own captivity mirrors real strategies of survival, while the collapse of her bargains warns against mistaking endurance for freedom.
Essential Quote
"I don’t regret it. I never have and I never will. I knew the price when I asked that day. I would rather answer his every call like a dog on a leash than lose you." — Chapter 16-20 Summary
This confession fuses love with servitude, revealing how devotion can authorize self-erasure. It crystallizes the theme’s central dilemma: a voluntary vow that feels righteous in motive but corrosive in effect—an act that protects Gabby while methodically unmaking Dianna’s freedom and sense of self.