What This Theme Explores
Manipulation and control in Everyone Here Is Lying interrogate who gets to tell the story—and how far people will go to make their version stick. The novel asks whether control is ever anything more than a comforting illusion, especially when desire, fear, and shame drive people to bend reality. It probes how small, private manipulations metastasize into public harm, revealing a moral economy where power is measured not by honesty but by one’s ability to script others’ perceptions. Most chillingly, it explores how the impulse to control isn’t bound by age, authority, or righteousness; it’s opportunistic and often rewarded.
How It Develops
The theme enters quietly through domestic secrecy and erupts into community-wide distortion. In the opening movement, William Wooler reflexively tries to contain a crisis of his own making by persuading his daughter, Avery, to keep quiet, while Nora Blanchard ends her affair as an act of self-protection and reclaimed agency. What begins as personal damage control—lies to preserve marriages, reputations, and routine—signals a world where control is synonymous with concealment.
As Avery’s disappearance detonates the plot, manipulation becomes both shield and weapon. William falsifies his account to police to steer suspicion away from himself, and Al Blanchard exerts a colder, passive dominance by witnessing Nora’s guilt and withholding confrontation. The turning point arrives when Marion Cooke, armed with jealousy and strategy, plants an anonymous story implicating Ryan Blanchard. With a single call, private vendettas become public “truth,” proving how easily an investigation’s trajectory can be commandeered.
By the climax, the cage of manipulation snaps shut on its builders. Marion’s scheme is unmasked, yet the coup de grâce belongs to Avery, who converts survival tactics into spectacle. Her escape and media performance demonstrate a precocious mastery of optics, culminating in the final interview where she seizes the narrative not just from her parents and the police, but from the novel’s presumed moral order. Control, the story suggests, accrues to whoever best weaponizes attention.
Key Examples
-
William’s attempt to bribe Avery: After striking her, he scrambles to manage fallout by proposing a script she can repeat in the first few chapters.
“Look, I’m sorry. I know it’s unforgivable, but let’s not tell your mother. She has a lot on her plate right now.” … “And we won’t tell her you came home by yourself… You can say you walked home with a friend.” This moment establishes manipulation as William’s first language: apology as leverage, empathy as bait, and narrative as damage control. Crucially, it also shows the fragility of such power—Avery’s silence withholds assent, denying him the control he craves.
-
Marion Cooke’s anonymous tip: Her fabricated account of seeing Avery enter Ryan’s car reroutes the entire investigation and destabilizes the Blanchard family. By staging reluctance and citing an abusive ex, she layers credibility onto a lie, revealing how manipulation thrives by mimicking vulnerability. The police, the public, and even the victims become conscripts in her narrative.
-
Al Blanchard’s silent torment:
He’s enjoying it. He’s enjoying seeing her suffer. It’s a just punishment, isn’t it? For what she’s been doing? In Chapters 11–15, Al’s refusal to confront Nora converts knowledge into power. His passivity isn’t moral restraint; it is domination through withholding, a reminder that control can be exercised as much by silence as by speech.
-
Avery’s final performance: During the televised interview in the final chapter, she tries to enshrine herself as hero and victim simultaneously.
“I was angry. She double-cross—” She stops herself. The aborted admission punctures her carefully curated story, exposing how her control is performative and precarious. Still, the very act of almost-confession demonstrates her fluency with attention—she knows how to ride the edge of revelation to keep the spotlight.
Character Connections
Avery Wooler emerges as the novel’s most unsettling strategist. She maps the fault lines in the adults around her—William’s guilt, Nora’s fragility, Marion’s jealousy—and steps on them at opportune moments. By recruiting, using, and discarding allies, she exposes manipulation not as aberrant cruelty but as a rational calculus in a world that rewards those who can script events.
Marion Cooke weaponizes grievance into orchestration. Her anonymous tip, staged altruism, and calculated surveillance show how a desire to punish can masquerade as civic duty. As her plot widens, control becomes both motive and method; the tighter she grips the story, the more she imperils herself, proving control can be self-entrapment.
William Wooler practices manipulation as clumsy triage. His lies to police and to his family are meant to stabilize the immediate situation, but each half-truth multiplies his exposure. His temper—an impulse he cannot master—ironically makes him manipulable; others exploit his volatility and guilt to redirect blame and narrative.
Erin strains to impose order on chaos and finds herself outmaneuvered by both her husband and her daughter. Her public confrontation of Ryan’s family, intended to reclaim the story, instead magnifies her loss of control. In the end, even the mother’s protective script is seized and rewritten by Avery, dramatizing how institutional and familial authority falter before media-savvy performance.
Symbolic Elements
The locked basement door concentrates the novel’s moral geometry. It is literal imprisonment under Marion’s control and, simultaneously, the trap Avery’s machinations spring back on Marion. As a symbol, it insists that domination creates its own prison; every lock fashioned for another can become self-sealing.
Burner phones embody clandestine control—tools for William and Nora to build a secret world outside their marriages. Their eventual discovery transforms private agency into public exposure, illustrating how instruments of concealment carry the seeds of their own undoing.
The televised interview is the book’s altar to narrative power. For Erin, it’s a ritual to sanitize the family story; for Avery, a stage to consolidate celebrity. It reveals the modern shift from truth-seeking to image management—the most durable control is control over the story others believe.
Contemporary Relevance
In an era shaped by viral narratives, misinformation, and curated identities, the novel reads like a case study in how attention governs truth. A single lie can redirect institutions; an artful performance can overrule facts. Everyone Here Is Lying shows how control migrates from private spaces to public platforms, where credibility is engineered and outrage is a tool. It warns that when narrative mastery becomes the highest currency, the line between victim and architect blurs—and real accountability vanishes.
Essential Quote
“I was angry. She double-cross—” She stops herself.
This fracturing mid-sentence is the theme in miniature: control exercised through narrative finesse, and control slipping at the moment of overreach. Avery’s near-confession reveals both her command of the story and the instability beneath it, proving that manipulation can seize a spotlight—but not always the truth that flickers under it.