THEME
The House of Eveby Sadeqa Johnson

Race, Colorism, and Prejudice

What This Theme Explores

Race, Colorism, and Prejudice in The House of Eve probes how power and belonging are policed not only across the color line but within the Black community itself. The novel asks who gets to claim safety, love, and opportunity—and at what cost—when access is filtered through skin tone, class, and lineage. It traces how external racism and internalized bias shape self-worth, strain relationships, and force characters to negotiate or conceal parts of themselves. Most urgently, it shows how prejudice—whether overt or insidious—turns love and ambition into risky acts.


How It Develops

The theme enters through parallel pressures on Ruby Pearsall and Eleanor Quarles. Ruby moves through Philadelphia under constant threat, her body and future circumscribed by white hostility that makes even errands feel perilous. Eleanor’s world initially seems safer—Howard’s promise of uplift and community—but the rejection she meets for not fitting elite standards reveals a second gatekeeping system built on color and class.

Midway, the pressures tighten as intimacy raises the stakes. Ruby’s relationship with Shimmy Shapiro exposes the nakedness of public prejudice: the couple’s private tenderness is constantly measured against the risks of being seen together. Eleanor’s marriage brings her into the orbit of the Black “old guard,” where Rose Pride makes it plain that pedigree and paleness matter more than character, turning Eleanor’s home life into a performance of worthiness.

By the end, the consequences harden into life-defining choices. Ruby’s pregnancy becomes leverage for those with social power to enforce racial boundaries, while Eleanor’s drive to belong tempts her into morally costly decisions that mimic the very exclusions she endured. In the Epilogue, their brief professional crossing suggests progress and survival, yet the residue of color and class hierarchies lingers, reminding us that time alone does not dissolve prejudice.


Key Examples

The novel’s conflicts sharpen through specific scenes that translate abstract prejudice into lived experience.

  • Daily harassment and danger (Chapter 1): A routine trip downtown turns violent when a white woman weaponizes a racial slur, collapsing Ruby’s ordinary day into fear.

    “Watch where you’re going, nigger,” she hissed as she grabbed her daughter tightly by the wrist. The cruelty is casual and public, signaling how white authority presumes control over space and safety—and how Ruby must constantly anticipate harm simply to exist in public.

  • Prejudice in commerce (Chapter 5): In Shimmy’s store, a customer’s discomfort becomes policy as Mr. Greenwald draws a hard line between serving and belonging.

    “You can serve them quickly, but they can’t hang around and definitely can’t sit at my counter. You know that, boy... You can’t be friends with the likes of her.” The counter becomes a boundary marker: Black people may be transacted with but not welcomed, turning Ruby’s presence into a social violation that must be corrected.

  • The impossibility of interracial love (Chapter 13): Ruby ends the relationship not because love fails, but because the world refuses to make their love survivable. Her choice is a concession to safety over desire, underscoring how racism converts intimacy into risk management.

  • The “paper bag test” at Howard: Eleanor’s rejection from an elite sorority translates intra-racial prejudice into a code of aesthetics and class.

    “Honey, everyone knows they only pick girls with hair straight as a ruler, and skin paler than a paper bag. Where have you been?” The criteria elevate proximity to whiteness as virtue, teaching Eleanor that achievement isn’t enough if her body and background don’t match a narrow ideal.

  • Judgment from the Black elite (Chapter 10): After marrying William Pride, Eleanor is reduced by Rose’s label—“ragamuffin girl from the Midwest”—which collapses her identity into class and complexion. The insult isn’t merely personal; it signals how gatekeepers protect status by humiliating and excluding those who threaten the façade.

  • Greta Hepburn’s taunts: Greta’s attacks—“He’s out of your league… You aren’t one of us”—enforce a social perimeter that Eleanor can only cross through erasure of self.

    “I’m just trying to save you the trouble. He’s out of your league, dear one... You aren’t one of us. Go back to the rat hole you crawled out of,” she sputtered. “With your cheap shoes.” Her language converts taste into moral superiority, revealing how respectability politics masquerade as standards while replicating white supremacist values.


Character Connections

Ruby Pearsall embodies how external racism compresses choice. Marked as vulnerable in public and suspect in interracial spaces, she learns to calculate danger in every decision. The rejection of her mother, Inez, by her father’s wealthier, lighter-skinned family foreshadows Ruby’s fate: both love and lineage are edited by color and class, long before Ruby can assert her own will.

Eleanor Quarles refuses to accept the ceilings imposed by colorist and classist codes, yet the price of entry into elite Black spaces is self-surveillance. Even after marriage to William Pride, she is made to compete with images of acceptability—lighter skin, old money, curated poise—that have little to do with integrity. Eleanor’s most desperate choices are less moral failings than survival strategies within a rigged audition.

Rose Pride personifies intra-racial gatekeeping: she curates family legacy through exclusion, mistaking fragility for refinement. Her preference for a woman like Greta is not simply snobbery but a worldview that equates social safety with resemblance to whiteness. Rose’s control over access—rooms, reputations, and resources—demonstrates how prejudice sustains itself by rewarding compliance.

Shimmy Shapiro wants love to be larger than race, but his community’s rules limit what he can risk. His affection is sincere; his protection is not enough. Through him, the novel critiques good intentions that fail to confront structures, showing how vulnerability is unevenly distributed even within mutual love.


Symbolic Elements

Howard University: As a “Black Mecca,” Howard signifies aspiration, community, and excellence. Yet its social hierarchies mirror the outside world, revealing how spaces built for uplift can reproduce the very exclusions they were meant to escape.

The ABC Sorority: Its unspoken “paper bag” criteria symbolize the internalization of white beauty and purity standards. By rewarding proximity to whiteness, the sorority codifies worth and turns belonging into a scarcity that disciplines women’s bodies and ambitions.

The Pride Family Home: Situated on the “Gold Coast,” the house gleams with achievement while operating as a tribunal. Its rooms confer status selectively, making hospitality a tool of judgment that keeps Eleanor perpetually on probation.

31st Street: The neighborhood around Shimmy’s store maps racial boundaries onto ordinary commerce. Counters, glances, and rules about loitering turn a simple shop into a border zone where interracial presence is treated as trespass.


Contemporary Relevance

Johnson’s portrait of layered prejudice feels uncomfortably current: colorism still shapes desirability and opportunity, while class divisions complicate solidarity within marginalized communities. The “paper bag” mentality persists in subtler forms across hiring, dating, and media representation, and respectability politics continue to police who is deemed worthy of protection. Interracial relationships may face fewer legal barriers today, yet the social calculus of risk, fetishization, and family pressure endures. The novel urges a dual reckoning—confronting overt racism and uprooting the quieter biases that fracture communities from within.


Essential Quote

“Honey, everyone knows they only pick girls with hair straight as a ruler, and skin paler than a paper bag. Where have you been?”

This line distills colorism into a casual rule so widely accepted it masquerades as common sense. By translating prejudice into aesthetic criteria, the sorority converts exclusion into “taste,” revealing how internalized white standards govern access to prestige. The throwaway tone—“everyone knows”—is the point: when bias feels ordinary, it becomes the architecture of opportunity.